International Scale Modeller

Hello all. It is time to vote for the Group Builds you want for 2018.

PLEASE READ!!

There are 3 votes per member.
PLEASE think carefully before voting.

NorthernModeller wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:38 pm .
PLEASE think carefully before voting.

I don't know...that sounds really hard.

Vote cast

Lysus wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:56 pm

NorthernModeller wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:38 pms
.
PLEASE think carefully before voting.

I don't know...that sounds really hard.

These guys need to ask, “How many is three???

Vote has been selected!

Done! It's been a while That I entered a GB, might enter next year...

DrSprue wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 3:38 am Vote has been selected!

[youtube]LVfe6rdHRKI[/youtube]

My votes are in
Now they just need to win too

My ‘no new kits in 2018’ stance has just taken a hammering. I reckon I’ve got only one of the SIGs covered and that one doesn’t look like it’s going to be selected anyway

Sorry but I voted in the wrong order Thankfully I've got three fingers on each hand so no probs there.....

Al

Voted

Weeeee! My list for Santa is here!

ElCapitan wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:06 pm8swhCTa.gif

Oddly enough that's the builds I voted for...

Heavy bomber SIG for the win - just put the new Airfix B17 on the Christmas list

Beats my no new kits rule and gets me a place in the 2018 SIGs -

Stokesy44 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:32 pm Heavy bomber SIG for the win - just put the new Airfix B17 on the Christmas list

Beats my no new kits rule and gets me a place in the 2018 SIGs -

Remember that kits for GBs are exempted from a "no new kits" contract

Lysus wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:38 pm

Stokesy44 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:32 pm Heavy bomber SIG for the win - just put the new Airfix B17 on the Christmas list

Beats my no new kits rule and gets me a place in the 2018 SIGs -

Remember that kits for GBs are exempted from a "no new kits" contract

I have all the kits I need, thank you very much
Really, the sheer nerve of some people

Lysus wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:38 pm

Stokesy44 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:32 pm Heavy bomber SIG for the win - just put the new Airfix B17 on the Christmas list

Beats my no new kits rule and gets me a place in the 2018 SIGs -

Remember that kits for GBs are exempted from a "no new kits" contract

Bloody Enabler! You're as bad as Scott is!

Stokesy44 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:58 pm

Lysus wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:38 pm

Stokesy44 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:32 pm Heavy bomber SIG for the win - just put the new Airfix B17 on the Christmas list

Beats my no new kits rule and gets me a place in the 2018 SIGs -

Remember that kits for GBs are exempted from a "no new kits" contract

Bloody Enabler! You're as bad as Scott is!

Ya, that Scott guy is a horrible enabler

Twokidsnosleep wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:53 pm Ya, that Scott guy is a horrible enabler

My neighbour in the flat below mine hates me because of you. That 1/16 Jagdtiger you made me buy - the damn thing fell through the floor and killed her dog!

Twokidsnosleep wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:53 pm

Stokesy44 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:58 pm

Lysus wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:38 pm

Remember that kits for GBs are exempted from a "no new kits" contract

Bloody Enabler! You're as bad as Scott is!

Ya, that Scott guy is a horrible enabler

So we're decided, it's all Scott's fault?

Second?

Lysus wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:46 am

Twokidsnosleep wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:53 pm

Stokesy44 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:58 pm

Bloody Enabler! You're as bad as Scott is!

Ya, that Scott guy is a horrible enabler

So we're decided, it's all Scott's fault?

Second?

Yes indeed, I will second that, he should be burned at the stake really
ummm we are talking about a different Scott, Ya???

Twokidsnosleep wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:03 am

Lysus wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:46 am

Twokidsnosleep wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:53 pm

Ya, that Scott guy is a horrible enabler

So we're decided, it's all Scott's fault?

Second?

Yes indeed, I will second that, he should be burned at the stake really

Depends if he weighs the same as...

Voted, but the one I really want to do doesn't seem very popular #sadface.
Well I will just have to build it anyways to spite you all #happyface

1975GinjaNinja wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:43 pm Voted, but the one I really want to do doesn't seem very popular #sadface.
Well I will just have to build it anyways to spite you all #happyface

I'm in the same boat, got a build that I was gonna start that would fit perfectly in a Cold War, jungle or desert setting (depending on markings) but I guess I'll just have to do it anyway

It'll be interesting to see what people come up with for community-organised GBs

Edit: Just wondering if there's any idea on what specifically qualifies as a "heavy bomber"? Role, engine number, ordnance tonnage, airframe weight, national designation? Just trying to plan out what I can allow myself to buy for next year and the Japanese idea of a heavy bomber in WWII was pretty different to the American definition for example

Wow - one clear leader but that's getting really tight for 2nd & 3rd!

Wow! A couple of days ago it looked like the voting was set. A sudden rush of voting has made it a close run for a few of these choices!

Voting has finished. thank you to all who voted GB rules and write ups will be along shortly